Главная страница » Публикации » 2011 » #7 (7) » Features of state industrial policy under imperfect technological and institutional environment

Features of state industrial policy under imperfect technological and institutional environment

State and Municipal Administration

Авторы

Юсим Вячеслав Наумович
доктор экономических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры «Экономики и организации промышленного производства»
Россия, Российский экономический университет имени Г.В.Плеханова
vn62@yandex.ru
Денисов Игорь Владимирович
доктор экономических наук, профессор кафедры «Экономики и организации промышленного производства»
Россия, Российский экономический университет имени Г.В.Плеханова
idennis@rambler.ru
Афанасьева Мария Васильевна
аспирантка кафедры «Экономики и организации промышленного производства»
Россия, Российский экономический университет имени Г.В.Плеханова
mara14@mail.ru

Аннотация

For all countries with imperfect technology and the institutional environment (low culture and organization of production, high levels of corruption, the small middle class, not necessarily the execution of laws, etc.), even such strong measures to support the economy like a direct financing of firms and territories, protectionism, stimulation of demand, etc. does not give significant effect. For Russia, which objectively have to be attributed to such countries, extremely relevant management system development, capable of overcoming difficulties, starting with the knees and the resistance of the imperfect (bad) technological and institutional environment. Several theoretical solutions recently obtained through the development of the theory of economic-technological development of civilization, can create the mechanism and conditions of such a system.

Ключевые слова

industrial policy, economic and technological development, economic-technological development, management development of the economy in an imperfect institutional environment, the development firm.

Рекомендуемая ссылка

Юсим Вячеслав Наумович, Денисов Игорь Владимирович, Афанасьева Мария Васильевна. Features of state industrial policy under imperfect technological and institutional environment // Современные технологии управления. ISSN 2226-9339. — #7 (7). Номер статьи: 0703. Дата публикации: 08.07.2011. Режим доступа: https://sovman.ru/en/article/0703/

Authors

Yusim Vyacheslav Naumovich
Doctor of Economics, Professor of "Economics and organization of industrial production»
Russia, Russian University of Economics named after G.V. Plekhanov
vn62@yandex.ru
Denisov Igor Vladimirovich
Doctor of Economics, Professor of "Economics and Organization of Industrial Production"
Russia, Russian University of Economics named after G.V. Plekhanov
idennis@rambler.ru
Afanasyeva Maria Vasilievna
graduate student of "Economics and Organization of Industrial Production"
Russia, Russian University of Economics named after G.V. Plekhanov
mara14@mail.ru

Abstract

Keywords

Suggested citation

Yusim Vyacheslav Naumovich, Denisov Igor Vladimirovich, Afanasyeva Maria Vasilievna. // Modern Management Technology. ISSN 2226-9339. — #7 (7). Art. #  0703. Date issued: 08.07.2011. Available at: https://sovman.ru/en/article/0703/

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Оправить мне на email статью

Читайте также

The evolution of public procurement: from the Russian Empire to the Russian Federation
Current problems of the realization of the right for the implementation of local self-government by the population in the municipal formations of the Nizhny Novgorod region
On the issue of organizing the management of the municipality
Econometric analysis of the gross regional product of the Far Eastern Federal District
Prospects for the implementation of the national project “Culture” in the city of Sevastopol

Библиографический список

  1. Dvortsin M, Jusim S. Technodynamics: Basic theory of the formation and development of technological systems. Monograph. M. “Dixie,” 1993.
  2. Denisov I. Theory of economic-technological development of firms. – M.: Grief and K, 2008.
  3. Lvov D. Prospects for long-term socio-economic development of Russia, Lecture delivered at the Presidium of RAS, Volume 73, № 8, 2003.
  4. Nikitin S., Stepanov M. The Japanese experience of revival and modern Russia. Money and Credit. – 1992. – № 8.
  5. Denisov I. Monopoly as a driving force for development of the company and its limitation. Economic analysis of № 19, 2008.
  6. Kudrin A. The global financial crisis and its impact on Russia. Problems of Economics № 1, 2009.
  7. Jusim S., Kolokolov V. Russia on the path to the new economy, Plekhanov. GV Plekhanov, M. 2006.
  8. Jusim S. The Cause of world crises. Problems of Economics № 1, 2009.
  9. Jusim S. Law of growth of economically feasible production volumes, M. Journal of Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, № 7, 8, 2005.
  10. The World Factbook 2009. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 2009. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html
  11. Understand America. Herald McKinsey № 3 (5) 2003. McKinsey.http://www.mckinsey.com/russianquarterly/articles/issue05/01_0303.aspx.