6+

Entrepreneurship, structural changes and tax payments

Send me via email

Authors


Associate Professor, Doctor of Economics, Professor of Human Resource Management
Russia, Southern Federal University
[email protected]


graduate student of Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship
Russia, Rostov State University of Economics
[email protected]

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of developing a business environment across industries. The characteristic of transformation as a result of resource constraints and the process of self-organization of ecological type. Held in the formalization of variational suggesting adequacy coenosis optimization theory structure of the business environment on the basis of fiscal restraint. We propose a streaming algorithm for determining the boundary size of the tax rate.

Keywords

The sectoral structure of entrepreneurship, self-organization, cenoses, tax regulation, resource constraints.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Categories of article:

Read also

No items found

Suggested citation

Kuz'minov Aleksandr Nikolaevich , Shirokov Ivan Olegovich
Entrepreneurship, structural changes and tax payments// Modern Management Technology. ISSN 2226-9339. – #4 (52). Art. # 5205. Date issued: . Available at: https://sovman.ru/en/article/5205/

Full article text is available only in Russian.
Please select from the menu Russian language and continue reading.


References

  1. Arshakuni, K.V. Econometric modeling of the genesis and dynamics of small new businesses [Jekonometricheskoe modelirovanie genezisa i dinamiki malyh novyh predprijatij]. Abstract. dis. … Cand. ehkon. Sciences. Moscow, 2005. 23 p.
  2. Kudrin, B.I. Classic technical cenoses. General and applied tsenologiya [Klassika tehnicheskih cenozov. Obshhaja i prikladnaja cenologija]. Tomsk. Tomsk State University  Center for System Studies, 2006.  220 p.
  3. Kuz’minov A.N. Tsenologicheskaya survival model enterprises (article) [Cenologicheskaja model’ vyzhivaemosti predprijatij (stat’ja)]. M . ATIS, 2009. System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader -URL: http://www.e-rej.ru/Articles/2009/Kuzminov.pdf (date of treatment 14.03.2015)
  4. Adler Nicholas Peter. Bringing Business into sociotechnical theory and practice.  Human Relations, 51, 3, 1998. 319ff.
  5. Allan N Afua. How Much Do Your Co-opetitors’ Capabilities Matter in the Face of Technological Change? Strategic Management Journal, 2000. 21(3). pp. 387–404.
  6. Agarwal Rajshree, Firm and product life cycles and firm survival. American Economic Review 2002/5/1. pp. 184-190
  7. Balasubramanian N. Firm Age and Innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2008. 17. pp. 1019–1047.
  8. Baldwin R. John. Competition Firm Turnover and Productivity Growth. Economic Analysis Research Paper Series, 2006. p. 42.
  9. Baumol William J. Productivity and American Leadership. Cambridge. MIT Press. 1989
  10. Budros Art 1997, The new capitalism and organizational rationality. the adoption of downsizing pro-grams, 1979-1994. Social Forces 76, 1997. 229ff.
  11. Cassiman Brun. Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-Ups. Management Science, 2006. 52. pp. 262–275.
  12. David Paul A. Path Dependence, its Critics and the Quest for Historical Economics.‖ In Geoffrey M. Hodgson (Ed.), The Evolution of Economic Institutions: A Critical Reader. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.
  13. Disney Richard. Restructuring and Productivity Growth in UK Manuacturing. Economic Journal, 2003. 113. pp. 666–694.
  14. Echevarria E. Christina. Changes in Sectoral Composition Associated with Economic Growth. International Economic Review, 1997. 38(2). pp. 431–452.
  15. Fagerberg Jan E. Schumpeter and the Revival of Evolutionary Economics: An Appraisal of the Literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2003.13(2). pp. 125–159.
  16. Foster Lucia. Market Selection, Reallocation, and Restructuring in the U.S. Retail Trade Sector in the 1990s. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006. 88. pp. 748–758.
  17. Gartner William B. Some Suggestions for Research on Entrepreneurial Traits and Characteristics. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1989. 14(1) pp. 27–37.
  18. Grabher Gernot. The Weakness of Strong Ties. The Embedded Firm. Routledge, 1993.
  19. Horte S. A. Docherty P., & Tulnalv C.  Key activities and key competences in a knowledge-based organization. The learning organization. Lulea.  Lulea University of Technology, 1996
  20. Klepper Steven J. Disagreements, Spinoffs, and the Evolution of Detroit as the Capital of the U.S. Automobile Industry. Management Science, 2007. 53. pp. 616–631.
  21. Koster Sierdjan. The Entrepreneurial and Replication Function of New Firm Formation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2007. 98(5). pp. 667–674.
  22. Kuznets Simon S. Economic Growth of Nations, Total Output and Productivity Structure. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  23. Lawrence Paul R. Organization and Environment Perspective 1981 In: Van de Ven.  Perspectives on Organizat Design and Behavior, John Wiley & Sons New York 1981. pp. 311-345.
  24. Metcalfe J. Stan, Evolutionary Concepts in Relation to Evolutionary Economics. The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge University Press 2005.
  25. Romer Paul M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990. 98. pp. 71–102.
  26. Scarpetta Stefano . The Role of Policy and Institutions for Productivity and Firm Dynamics: Evidence from Micro and Industry Data. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2002. p. 329.
  27. Zagler Martin. Economic Growth, Structural Change, and Search Unemployment. Journal of Economics, 2009. 96. pp.63–78.