Methodology evaluation of innovative projects under risk and uncertainty

no data

This article deals with problems connected with the assessment of innovative projects in the context of risk and uncertainty, topical issues of evaluation of innovative projects at the present stage of development of the Russian economy. By the example of the solution of the "crossing the river" is considering the possibility of using hierarchical models to address it. In what follows, and compares the priorities of different groups of factors are given by calculating the overall costs and benefits. The paper provides a rationale for combined use of four aspects: the beneficial aspects of the decision (the benefits and opportunities) and negative (costs and risks) that may lead to the decision in question.


innovation projects; cognitive hierarchy model, the direct and inverse hierarchical model of risk analysis, the ratio of the priorities of the costs and benefits, the task of "crossing the river", the analytic hierarchy process, a three-level hierarchical structure of the "purpose - the criteria - alternatives", factors and benefits cost factors, evaluation of priorities in hierarchies and their interpretation, the structure BOCR.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Categories of article:

Read also

Suggested citation

no data
Methodology evaluation of innovative projects under risk and uncertainty// Modern Management Technology. ISSN 2226-9339. – #9 (21). Art. # 2103. Date issued: . Available at:

Full article text is available only in Russian.
Please select from the menu Russian language and continue reading.


  1. Sboev B.K. K voprosu ob otsenke innovatsionnyih proektov v usloviyah neopredelennosti informatsii // Nauka i biznes, # 10, 2012 g.
  2. Shumetov V.G., Milyih F.G. Informatsionno-analiticheskoe i pro-gnoznoe obespechenie upravleniya innovatsionnyimi ekonomicheskimi protses-sami: metodologicheskiy aspekt // Upravlenie innovatsionno-investitsionnyimi protsessami na osnove vovlecheniya v hozyaystvennyiy oborot intellektualnoy sobstvennosti i kachestvom podgotovki spetsialistov v re-gionah Rossii. Materialyi Mezhdunar. n.-prakt. konf. Ch.1. Orel: OrelGTU, 2002.
  3. Shumetov V.G., Sekerin A.B., Gudov V.A. Innovatsionnyiy menedzh-ment na osnove ekspertnyih znaniy / Pod red. prof. V.G. Shumetova. Orel: ORAGS, 2003.
  4. Batin B.A. Ierarhiya ekspertno-analiticheskih modeley otsenki ris-ka investitsionnyih proektov promyishlennogo predpriyatiya // Vestnik NIIRPO. Seriya «Ekonomika i upravlenie». Vyip.1. M.: Izd-vo NIIRPO, 2008.
  5. Saati T. Prinyatie resheniy. Metod analiza ierarhiy. M.: Radio i svyaz, 1993.
  6. Kuznetsov A.I., Shumetov V.G. Expert Decide dlya Windows 95, 98, NT, 2000, Me. Versiya 2.2. Rukovodstvo polzovatelya. Orel: ORAGS, 2002.
  7. Saati T. Prinyatie resheniy pri zavisimostyah i obratnyih svyazyah: Analiticheskie seti. Per. s angl. / Nauch. red. A.V. Andreychikov, O.N. And-reychikova. M.: Izdatelstvo LKI, 2008.

MCNIP © 2011-2017
Modern management technology
ISSN 2226-9339
The network publication (site) is registered by Roskomnadzor, a certificate of the media EL FS #77 – 44067 from 01.03.2011.

Output Options
Open Access Journal
Frequency of issue – monthly
Language magazine: Russian, English
Area of distribution – the Russian Federation, foreign countries
Age category Site 6 +