Главная страница » Публикации » 2012 » #9 (21) » Methodology evaluation of innovative projects under risk and uncertainty

Methodology evaluation of innovative projects under risk and uncertainty

Innovations Management

Авторы

Сбоев Борис Константинович
аспирант
Россия, Институт международной экономики и информатизации
bks.008@mail.ru

Аннотация

This article deals with problems connected with the assessment of innovative projects in the context of risk and uncertainty, topical issues of evaluation of innovative projects at the present stage of development of the Russian economy. By the example of the solution of the "crossing the river" is considering the possibility of using hierarchical models to address it. In what follows, and compares the priorities of different groups of factors are given by calculating the overall costs and benefits. The paper provides a rationale for combined use of four aspects: the beneficial aspects of the decision (the benefits and opportunities) and negative (costs and risks) that may lead to the decision in question.

Ключевые слова

innovation projects; cognitive hierarchy model, the direct and inverse hierarchical model of risk analysis, the ratio of the priorities of the costs and benefits, the task of "crossing the river", the analytic hierarchy process, a three-level hierarchical structure of the "purpose - the criteria - alternatives", factors and benefits cost factors, evaluation of priorities in hierarchies and their interpretation, the structure BOCR.

Рекомендуемая ссылка

Сбоев Борис Константинович. Methodology evaluation of innovative projects under risk and uncertainty // Современные технологии управления. ISSN 2226-9339. — #9 (21). Номер статьи: 2103. Дата публикации: 08.09.2012. Режим доступа: https://sovman.ru/en/article/2103/

Authors

Sboev Boris Konstantinovich
post-graduate
Russia, Institute of International Economics and Information
bks.008@mail.ru

Abstract

Keywords

Suggested citation

Sboev Boris Konstantinovich. // Modern Management Technology. ISSN 2226-9339. — #9 (21). Art. #  2103. Date issued: 08.09.2012. Available at: https://sovman.ru/en/article/2103/

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Оправить мне на email статью

Читайте также

Building a cognitive model as the basis for planning the development of an innovative enterprise
“Knowledge” is a key element of the competitiveness of the research and production complex
Investment process in the innovation economy
Innovative enterprise management: key concepts, features, examples
The problem of assessing the value of intellectual property in Russia in the digital economy

Библиографический список

  1. Sboev B.K. K voprosu ob otsenke innovatsionnyih proektov v usloviyah neopredelennosti informatsii // Nauka i biznes, # 10, 2012 g.
  2. Shumetov V.G., Milyih F.G. Informatsionno-analiticheskoe i pro-gnoznoe obespechenie upravleniya innovatsionnyimi ekonomicheskimi protses-sami: metodologicheskiy aspekt // Upravlenie innovatsionno-investitsionnyimi protsessami na osnove vovlecheniya v hozyaystvennyiy oborot intellektualnoy sobstvennosti i kachestvom podgotovki spetsialistov v re-gionah Rossii. Materialyi Mezhdunar. n.-prakt. konf. Ch.1. Orel: OrelGTU, 2002.
  3. Shumetov V.G., Sekerin A.B., Gudov V.A. Innovatsionnyiy menedzh-ment na osnove ekspertnyih znaniy / Pod red. prof. V.G. Shumetova. Orel: ORAGS, 2003.
  4. Batin B.A. Ierarhiya ekspertno-analiticheskih modeley otsenki ris-ka investitsionnyih proektov promyishlennogo predpriyatiya // Vestnik NIIRPO. Seriya «Ekonomika i upravlenie». Vyip.1. M.: Izd-vo NIIRPO, 2008.
  5. Saati T. Prinyatie resheniy. Metod analiza ierarhiy. M.: Radio i svyaz, 1993.
  6. Kuznetsov A.I., Shumetov V.G. Expert Decide dlya Windows 95, 98, NT, 2000, Me. Versiya 2.2. Rukovodstvo polzovatelya. Orel: ORAGS, 2002.
  7. Saati T. Prinyatie resheniy pri zavisimostyah i obratnyih svyazyah: Analiticheskie seti. Per. s angl. / Nauch. red. A.V. Andreychikov, O.N. And-reychikova. M.: Izdatelstvo LKI, 2008.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *