Comparative analysis of assessment models of public administration


Associate Professor, PhD, Deputy Head of Department "State and Municipal Management" for educational and methodical work
Russia, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
m[email protected]

Russia, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
[email protected]

Russia, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
[email protected]


In the article a comparative analysis of models of assessment of public authorities' activity is carried out. The authors give the characteristic of the directions of efficiency assessment of public administration in the western countries. The detailed characteristic of two key models of public administration assessment (productive and expensive) is touched upon as well. 


assessment of public administration efficiency, models, central management, expenses on public administration, foreign experience.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Categories of article:

Read also

Project finance

This article was prepared on the results of research carried out at the expense of budget funds by the State the task of the Financial University, 2014.

Suggested citation

Panina Ol'ga Vladimirovna , Krivcova Marina Konstantinovna , Podzorova Marija Aleksandrovna
Comparative analysis of assessment models of public administration// Modern Management Technology. ISSN 2226-9339. – #10 (46). Art. # 4606. Date issued: . Available at:

Full article text is available only in Russian.
Please select from the menu Russian language and continue reading.


  1. Butova T.V., Dudko M.A. Public ideology, relevance, necessity, importance. Theoretical and practical questions of science of the XXI century. Collection of articles of the International scientific and practical conference [Gosudarstvennaja ideologija, aktual’nost’, neobhodimost’, vazhnost’. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy nauki XXI veka Sbornik statej Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii]. Editor-in-chief Sukiasjan A.A., 2014. pp. 235-239.
  2. Butova T.V., Erhov M.V. Business as object of influence of the government. Federal relations and regional social and economic policy [Biznes kak ob#ekt vozdejstvija gosudarstvennoj vlasti. Federativnye otnoshenija i regional’naja social’no-jekonomicheskaja politika]. 2008. № 2. p. 35.
  3. Zerkin D.P., Ignatov V.G. The grounds of the theory of public administration [Osnovy teorii gosudarstvennogo upravlenija]. Rostov-on-Don. MarT, 2012. p. 448.
  4. Kochetkov G.B. National models of management and usage of foreign experience Kochetkov G. B. the USA and Canada, economy, policy, culture [Nacional’nye modeli upravlenija i ispol’zovanie zarubezhnogo opyta by Kochetkov G.B.  SShA i Kanada, jekonomika, politika, kul’tura]. 2010. №12.  pp. 73-87.
  5. Purlik V.M. Comparative analysis of models of corporate management and Russian practice Purlik V.M. Economic analysis: theory and practice [ Sravnitel’nyj analiz modelej korporativnogo upravlenija i rossijskaja praktika  Purlik  V.M. Jekonomicheskij analiz, teorija i praktika]. 2013. №2. pp. 20-27.
  6.  Chirkin V.E. Public administration [Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie].  M., Jurist, 2012. p. 320.