6+

Improving the efficiency of state incentives for innovation in Russia

ПОДЕЛИТЬСЯ С ДРУЗЬЯМИ
Авторы


Dr. ehkon. Sciences, prof. the department "Finance and Credit"
Russia, the Volga Humanitarian Institute
litvinova_av@mail.ru


cand. ehkon. Sciences, Assoc. the department "Finance and Credit"
Russia, the Volga Humanitarian Institute
talalaeva_ns@mail.ru


cand. ehkon. Sciences, Assoc. the department "Finance and Credit"
Russia, the Volga Humanitarian Institute
pvv_65@mail.ru

Аннотация

Characteristics of effective stimulation of innovation, defined predominant role of the state in the process of its implementation. It is shown that stimulating innovation is an important function of government regulation in terms of changing the structure of the national product, achieving and maintaining national competitive advantages in the global economy. Instruments have been identified by which there is a direct impact on innovators and provides the desired results of this impact. As well as suggesting new effective tools.

Ключевые слова

Stimulation, encouragement for innovation, government incentives, tools, government regulation.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Категории статьи:

Read also

Статья также доступна (this article also available):

Рекомендуемая ссылка

Litvinova Alla Vladimirovna , Talalaeva Natal'ja Sergeevna , Parfenova Marija Viktorovna
Improving the efficiency of state incentives for innovation in Russia// Современные технологии управления. ISSN 2226-9339. – #4 (52). Номер статьи: 5206. Дата публикации: . Режим доступа: https://sovman.ru/en/article/5206/

Full article text is available only in Russian.
Please select from the menu Russian language and continue reading.


Библиографический список

  1. Blazhenkova N.M. Theory and methodology of analysis of the impact on the effectiveness of management accounting and economic organization. monograph [Teorija i metodologija analiza vlijanija upravlencheskogo ucheta na rezul’tativnost’ hozjajstvennoj organizacii. monografija] Luxembourg. Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2008.  321 p.
  2. Gamidullaev R.B. Development of methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of gosu-state support of small innovative enterprises in the Russian Federation [Razrabotka metodiki ocenki jeffektivnosti gosu-darstvennoj podderzhki malogo innovacionnogo predprinimatel’stva v RF]. Public administration. The newsletter. 2012. № 32. Mode of access: http://e-journal.spa.msu.ru/, free (02/20/2015 city). Caps. from the screen.
  3. Gordeev D.A. Problems of development of new institutional forms and relationships in innovative activity in the Russian Federation [Problemy razvitija novyh institucional’nyh form i otnoshenij v innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti v Rossijskoj Federacii]. Economic Revival of Russia.  2009. № 3 (21). pp. 52-58.
  4. Indicators of innovation 2012 [Indikatory innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti 2012] // Access: www.hse.ru/primarydata/2012, free (02/20/2015 city). Caps. from the screen.
  5. Kalacheva O.S. Development of methods of tax incentives for innovation in Russia [Razvitie metodov nalogovogo stimulirovanija innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti v Rossii]. Sciences. 08.00.05  Economy and management of national economy (innovation management). Volgograd. 2012.  28 p.
  6. Materials for the meeting of the Government Commission on High Technology and Innovation On improving the efficiency of the use of funds allocated for innovation [Materialy k zasedaniju Pravitel’stvennoj komissii po vysokim tehnologijam i innovacijam O povyshenii jeffektivnosti ispol’zovanija sredstv, napravljaemyh na innovacionnuju dejatel’nost’]. Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, 2010. 117 p.
  7. Mindeli L.Je. Problems and prospects of funding for science and innovation in Russia [Problemy i perspektivy finansirovanija nauki i innovacij v Rossii]. Access: http://www.issras.ru, free (01/19/2015 city).  Caps. from the screen.
  8. Mikheev V.V. Who and how to evaluate the effectiveness of budget expenditures [Kto i kak ocenit jeffektivnost’ bjudzhetnyh rashodov] budget. №10. pp. 2-6.
  9.  Pereslegin A.V. On some measures to improve the effectiveness of federal target programs [O nekotoryh merah po povysheniju jeffektivnosti federal’nyh celevyh programm]. Interdisciplinary Information Service.  2004.  №3-4. pp. 61-80.
  10. Simchera V.M. Methods of multivariate statistical data analysis. studies. Manual [Metody mnogomernogo analiza statisticheskih dannyh. ucheb. posobie]. Moscow. Finance and Statistics, 2008.  400 p.
  11. Sirazetdinov R.M. Simulation of innovative development of investment and construction of the complex (for example, the Republic of Tatarstan) [Modelirovanie innovacionnogo razvitija investicionno-stroitel’nogo kompleksa (na primere respubliki Tatarstan)]. RM Sirazetdinov.  Proceedings KGASU.  2011.  № 3. pp. 219-228.
  12. Spicyn V.V. Comparative analysis of innovative activity in Russia and abroad [Sravnitel’nyj analiz pokazatelej innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti Rossii i zarubezhnyh stran]. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2010.  №331. pp. 153-158.
  13. Federal Target Program of Russia [Federal’nye celevye programmy Rossii]. Access: http://www.programs-gov.ru/, free (02/15/2015 city). Caps. with eq-wound.
  14. The federal budget [Federal’nyj bjudzhet]. Access: http://www1.minfin.ru/ru/budget/federal_budget/, free (15/02/2015 city).
  15. Hametov T.I. Cost-effectiveness of investing in innovation construction companies [Jekonomicheskaja jeffektivnost’ investirovanija v innovacionnuju dejatel’nost’ predprijatij stroitel’nogo kompleksa]. Regional architecture and engineering.  2012.  № 1. pp. 188-192.