6+

The economic function of the state and the problem of state intervention in the economy

ПОДЕЛИТЬСЯ С ДРУЗЬЯМИ
Authors


PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Management of Enterprises and Production Complexes
Russia, St. Petersburg State University of Economics
sirenaspb@yandex.ru

Abstract

In the article on the basis of consideration of various approaches to the concept of “state” defines its actual significance, reveals the dual role of the state as a regulator of economic processes, with its inherent problem of distinguishing between management and regulation functions from functions The implementation of the economic function, as reflected in the work, is largely due to the imperfection of the state, its inability to provide allocates resources, identified the negative consequences of government intervention in the economy, both in setting strategic goals and in enforcing decisions due to the low efficiency of actions of the state bureaucracy, the importance of institutional transformations conducive to economic development, taking into account the determinants of culture and trust, with the determining influence of civil society.

Keywords

state, economic function of the state, state intervention, development economics, generalized trust, allocation inefficiency, irrationality of bureaucracy.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Categories of article:

Read also

Suggested citation

Trifonov Stanislav Viktorovich
The economic function of the state and the problem of state intervention in the economy// Modern Management Technology. ISSN 2226-9339. – #1 (91). Art. # 9102. Date issued: . Available at: https://sovman.ru/en/article/the-economic-function-of-the-state-and-the-problem-of-state-intervention-in-the-economy/

Full article text is available only in Russian.
Please select from the menu Russian language and continue reading.


References

  1. Martyshin O.V. On the history of the formation of the concept of “state” [K istorii formirovaniya ponyatiya «gosudarstvo»]//Vestnik University O. Kutafina, 2019. 46
  2. Auzan A. Economics of everything. How institutions determine our lives [Ekonomika vsego. Kak instituty opredelyayut nashu zhizn’]. 4th ed. –M .: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2017. -192 p.
  3. Lyudvig fon Mizes. Bureaucracy, Planned chaos, Anti-capitalist mentality [Byurokratiya, Zaplanirovannyy khaos, Antikapitalisticheskaya mental’nost’]- M .: “Case”, 1993, – P.240
  4. Compositions [Sochineniya]. M., 1971. T. 3. Book. 1, pp. 106-107.
  5. Leviathan. M .: Thought, 2001.
  6. Lokk Dzh. Two treatises on the board [Dva traktata o pravlenii]. -Kn.2. // In the book: Locke J. Works: In 3 t.-T.3.-M.: Thought, 1988 – p. 262-356
  7. Mizes L. (2001). Liberalism in the classical tradition [Liberalizm v klassicheskoy traditsii]. M .: Social; Economy.
  8. Smit A. Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of peoples [Issledovaniye i prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov]T.2.M; L., 1935
  9. Kouz R. Firm, market and law “[ Firma, rynok i pravo?]// M .:” Delo LTD “, 1993, – S.192.
  10. Rotbard M. Power and the market: State and economy [Vlast’ i rynok]. Chelyabinsk: Socium, 2003.
  11. Bal’tserovich L. Towards a limited state [Navstrechu ogranichennomu gosudarstvu]/ per. from English M., 2007
  12. Antsupov V.V. The economic function of the state [Antsupov V.V. Ekonomicheskaya funktsiya gosudarstva]: Dis. … cand. legal Sciences: 12.00.01: Abakan, 2003 200 c. RSL OD, 61: 04-12 / 12
  13. Rubinshteyn A.YA., Gorodetskiy A.Ye.State paternalism and paternalistic failure in the theory of trusteeship benefits [Gosudarstvennyy paternalizm i paternalistskiy proval v teorii opekayemykh blag]// Journal of Institutional Studies Volume 10, No. 4, 2018
  14. Gorodetsky Public administration and economic security. On the dysfunctions of public administration // Audit and financial analysis, No. 6, p. 426−437
  15. Volkov V.V. State, or Price of Order [Gosudarstvo, ili Tsena poryadka]// St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg, 2018. – 160 p.
  16. Khayyek F. The road to slavery [Doroga k rabstvu]. – M.: Economics, 1992 .– 175 p.
  17. Kaloguzov Ye.A., Bogdanova A. S. The role of the state in the economy: from traditional to the new paradigm [Rol’ gosudarstva v ekonomike: ot traditsionnoy k novoy paradigme]//Bulletin of the Omsk University 2016, p.38
  18. Milushev D.F. The limits of state intervention in the economy: theoretical and legal aspect [Predely vmeshatel’stva gosudarstva v ekonomiku: teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt] //Vestnik PAGS 2011
  19. Mel’nik D. V. The concept of social liberalism in the “market of ideas” of modern Russia [Kontseptsiya sotsial’nogo liberalizma na «rynke idey» sovremennoy Rossii] // Social Sciences and the Present, 2015.No. 2, p. 43−53
  20. Zaostrovtsev A. History and development: interpretation of the Austrian economic school [Istoriya i razvitiye: traktovka avstriyskoy ekonomicheskoy shkoly]: Preprint M-23/11. – SPb. : Publishing house of the European University in St. Petersburg, 2011. – 36 p.
  21. Boettke P.J., Coyne Ch.J. Leeson P. T. Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2008. Vol. 67, no. 2. P. 331–358.
  22. Adzhemoglu Daron. Why are some countries rich and others poor [, Pochemu odni strany bogatyye, a drugiye bednyye]. –M: AST Publishing House, 2016. – X, 693
  23. Begel’sdayk SH., Maseland R. Culture in economic science [Kul’tura v ekonomicheskoy nauke]. Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2016. – 385