6+

Problems of Russian natural science at the beginning of the third decade of the XXI century

Send me via email

Authors


Assistant of the Department of Radiobiology and Biophysics named after Academician A.D.Belov
Russia, Moscow State Academy of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology - M.I. Scriabin
[email protected]

Abstract

This article deals with the main problems currently occurring in Russian science. Meanwhile, the main focus is on the field of natural sciences, in particular, biology. This is due to the fact that the development of this scientific field has been given a special place in the government regulations, over the past two years. The article discusses the goals of the Science National Project and the Program for the Development of Genetic Technologies. Arguments are given in favor of the incorrectness of the criteria for evaluating of effectiveness both the researchers and some of the challenges which are presented in these documents. It is pointed out why Russian science would never be able to take a leading position in the world, why the really updating the staff and the true development of the Russian science would be impossible, under the current conditions. The latter, in general, is due to the inability to conduct the multicast researches. The paper provides the recommendations for solving a number of issues raised.

Keywords

science management, bibliometric indicators, scientist efficiency, scientist motivation, financing of Russian science

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Categories of article:

Read also

Suggested citation

Romodin Leonid Aleksandrovich
Problems of Russian natural science at the beginning of the third decade of the XXI century// Modern Management Technology. ISSN 2226-9339. – #3 (96). Art. # 9605. Date issued: . Available at: https://sovman.ru/en/article/9605/

Full article text is available only in Russian.
Please select from the menu Russian language and continue reading.


References

  1. Passport of the national project “Science” [Pasport natsional’nogo proyekta «Nauka»] (approved by the Presidium of the Presidential Council for Strategic Development and National Projects, Protocol № 6 of 24.12.2018). URL: http://www.econom22.ru/pnp/natsionalnye-proekty-programmy/%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0.pdf
  2. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation № 479 of April 22, 2019 “On Approval of the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Genetic Technologies for 2019-2027” [Ob utverzhdenii Federal’noy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy programmy razvitiya geneticheskikh tekhnologiy na 2019–2027 gody]. URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201904230021?index=53&rangeSize=1
  3. Rebrikov D.V., Korostin D.O., SHubina E.S., Il’inskij V.V. NGS: high-performance sequencing [NGS: vysokoproizvoditel’noye sekvenirovaniye]; under the general editorship of D. V. Rebrikov – 2nd edition. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya znanij, 2015. – 232 p.
  4. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes [O zashchite zhivotnykh, ispol’zuyushchikhsya dlya nauchnykh tseley]. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/63/oj
  5. Lazar M.G. Ethical aspects of functioning of the russian grant system science funding [Eticheskiye aspekty funktsionirovaniya rossiyskoy grantovoy sistemy finansirovaniya nauki]// Sociologia Nauki I Tehnologij-Sociology of Science and Technology. 2016. V 7. Is. 3. P. 51–64.
  6. Regulations on awarding academic titles. The Russian regulatory document. [Polozheniye o prisvoyenii uchonykh zvaniy] URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&prevDoc=102075416&backlink=1&&nd=102169683
  7. Kulagin A.S. Monitoring of scientific organizations or monitoring of scientific research. What is the correct way? [Monitoring nauchnykh organizatsiy ili monitoring nauchnykh issledovaniy. Kak pravil’neye?]// Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2020. V. 90. Is. 6. P. 549–559. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587320060079
  8. Kulagin A.S. On terminological confusion in the evaluation of the results of scientific activity  [O terminologicheskoy putanitse v otsenke rezul’tatov nauchnoy deyatel’nosti]// Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2016. V. 86. Is. 8. P. 698–705. DOI: 10.7868/S0869587316080053
  9. Mikhailov O.V. Paradoxes of citation [Paradoksy tsitirovaniya]// Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2018. T88. Is. 3. P. 268–271. DOI: 10.7868/S0869587318030131
  10. Rostovtsev A.A. The Russian and International practices of identification of irresponsible journals and authors [Rossiyskaya i mezhdunarodnaya praktika vyyavleniya nedobrosovestnykh zhurnalov i avtorov]// Nauchnyi Redaktor i Izdatel’=Science Editor and Publisher. 2017. V. 2. Is. 1. P. 30–37. [in Russian] DOI: 10.24069/2542-0267-2017-1-30-37
  11. Watson J.D., Crick F.H. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid // Nature. 1953. V. 171. P. 737–738. DOI: 10.1038/171737a0
  12. 12. Zhou J., Grigoryan G. Rapid search for tertiary fragments reveals protein sequence-structure relationships // Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society. 2015. V. 24. Is. 4. P. 508–524. DOI: 10.1002/pro.2610
  13. Yusa S., Oliveira-Martins J.B., Sugita-Konishi Y., Kikuchi Y. Cellular prion protein: from physiology to pathology // Viruses. 2012. V. 4. P. 3109–3131. DOI: 10.3390/v4113109
  14. Kagan V.E., Tyurina Y.Y., Sun W.Y. et al. Redox phospholipidomics of enzymatically generated oxygenated phospholipids as specific signals of programmed cell death // Free radical biology & medicine. 2020. V. 147. P. 231–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.12.028
  15. Le Bras A. The mouse brain lipidome // Lab animal. 2020. V. 49. Is. 11. P. 313. DOI: 10.1038/s41684-020-00678-8
  16. Hofbauer H.F., Heier C., Sen Saji A.K., Kuhnlein R.P. Lipidome remodeling in aging normal and genetically obese Drosophila males // Insect biochemistry and molecular biology. 2020. Nov 20:103498. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103498
  17. Hsieh W.Y., Williams K.J., Su B., Bensinger S.J. Profiling of mouse macrophage lipidome using direct infusion shotgun mass spectrometry // STAR protocols. 2021. V. 2. Is. 1. P. 100235. DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100235
  18. Rozhdestvensky L.M. Challenges of development of radiation countermeasures // Radiation biology. Radioecology. 2019. V. 59. Is. 2. P. 117–126. [in Russian] DOI: 10.1134/S0869803119020139